Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 7.431
1.
Prev Med ; 183: 107982, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701952

OBJECTIVE: The fight against cervical cancer requires effective screening together with optimal and on-time treatment along the care continuum. We examined the impact of cervical cancer testing and treatment guidelines on testing practices, and follow-up adherence to guidelines. METHODS: Data from Estonian electronic health records and healthcare provision claims for 50,702 women was used. The annual rates of PAP tests, HPV tests and colposcopies during two guideline periods (2nd version 2012-2014 vs 3rd version 2016-2019) were compared. To assess the adherence to guidelines, the subjects were classified as adherent, over- or undertested based on the timing of the appropriate follow-up test. RESULTS: The number of PAP tests decreased and HPV tests increased during the 3rd guideline period (p < 0.01). During the 3rd guideline period, among 21-29-year-old women, the adherence to guidelines ranged from 38.7% (44.4…50.1) for ASC-US to 73.4% (62.6…84.3) for HSIL and among 30-59-year-old from 49.0% (45.9…52.2) for ASC-US to 65.7% (58.8…72.7) for ASCH. The highest rate of undertested women was for ASC-US (21-29y: 25.7%; 30-59y: 21.9%). The rates of over-tested women remained below 12% for all cervical pathologies observed. There were 55.2% (95% CI 49.7…60.8) of 21-24-year-olds and 57.1% (95% CI 53.6…60.6) of 25-29-year-old women who received HPV test not adherent to guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted some shortcomings in guideline adherence, especially among women under 30. The insights gained from this study help to improve the quality of care and, thus, reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality.


Early Detection of Cancer , Electronic Health Records , Guideline Adherence , Papanicolaou Test , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Vaginal Smears , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Middle Aged , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data , Estonia , Colposcopy , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Mass Screening
2.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29521, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727013

Methylation panels, tools for investigating epigenetic changes associated with diseases like cancer, can identify DNA methylation patterns indicative of disease, providing diagnostic or prognostic insights. However, the application of methylation panels focusing on the sex-determining region Y-box 1 (SOX1) and paired box gene 1 (PAX1) genes for diagnosing cervical lesions is under-researched. This study aims to examine the diagnostic performance of PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation as a marker for cervical precancerous lesions and its potential application in triage diagnosis. From September 2022 to April 2023, 181 patients with abnormal HPV-DNA tests or cytological exam results requiring colposcopy were studied at Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital, China. Data were collected from colposcopy, cytology, HPV-DNA tests, and PAX1/SOX1 methylation detection. Patients were categorized as control, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 1 (CIN1), Grade 2 (CIN2), Grade 3 (CIN3), and cervical cancer (CC) groups based on histopathology. We performed HPV testing, liquid-based cytology, and PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation testing. We evaluated the diagnostic value of methylation detection in cervical cancer using DNA methylation positivity rate, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), and explored its potential for triage diagnosis. PAX1/SOX1 methylation positivity rates were: control 17.1%, CIN1 22.5%, CIN2 100.0%, CIN3 90.0%, and CC 100.0%. The AUC values for PAX1 gene methylation detection in diagnosing CIN1+, CIN2+, and CIN3+ were 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.62), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.97), and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00), respectively. Corresponding AUC values for SOX1 gene methylation detection were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.40-0.58), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68-0.93), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.811-1.00), respectively. In HPV16/18-negative patients, methylation detection showed sensitivity of 32.4% and specificity of 83.7% for CIN1+. For CIN2+ and CIN3+, sensitivity was all 100%, with specificities of 83.0% and 81.1%. Among the patients who underwent colposcopy examination, 166 cases had cytological examination results ≤ASCUS, of which 37 cases were positive for methylation, and the colposcopy referral rate was 22.29%. PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation detection exhibits strong diagnostic efficacy for cervical precancerous lesions and holds significant value in triage diagnosis.


DNA Methylation , Paired Box Transcription Factors , Papillomavirus Infections , SOXB1 Transcription Factors , Triage , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/genetics , Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/genetics , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Middle Aged , Triage/methods , Paired Box Transcription Factors/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , China , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/genetics , Young Adult , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Colposcopy
3.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10812, 2024 05 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734714

Cervical cancer, the second most prevalent cancer affecting women, arises from abnormal cell growth in the cervix, a crucial anatomical structure within the uterus. The significance of early detection cannot be overstated, prompting the use of various screening methods such as Pap smears, colposcopy, and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing to identify potential risks and initiate timely intervention. These screening procedures encompass visual inspections, Pap smears, colposcopies, biopsies, and HPV-DNA testing, each demanding the specialized knowledge and skills of experienced physicians and pathologists due to the inherently subjective nature of cancer diagnosis. In response to the imperative for efficient and intelligent screening, this article introduces a groundbreaking methodology that leverages pre-trained deep neural network models, including Alexnet, Resnet-101, Resnet-152, and InceptionV3, for feature extraction. The fine-tuning of these models is accompanied by the integration of diverse machine learning algorithms, with ResNet152 showcasing exceptional performance, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of 98.08%. It is noteworthy that the SIPaKMeD dataset, publicly accessible and utilized in this study, contributes to the transparency and reproducibility of our findings. The proposed hybrid methodology combines aspects of DL and ML for cervical cancer classification. Most intricate and complicated features from images can be extracted through DL. Further various ML algorithms can be implemented on extracted features. This innovative approach not only holds promise for significantly improving cervical cancer detection but also underscores the transformative potential of intelligent automation within the realm of medical diagnostics, paving the way for more accurate and timely interventions.


Deep Learning , Early Detection of Cancer , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Neural Networks, Computer , Algorithms , Papanicolaou Test/methods , Colposcopy/methods
4.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0301385, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578742

BACKGROUND: In order for low and middle income countries (LMIC) to transition to Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) test based cervical cancer screening, a greater understanding of how to implement these evidence based interventions (EBI) among vulnerable populations is needed. This paper documents outcomes of an implementation research on HPV screening among women from tribal, rural, urban slum settings in India. METHODS: A mixed-method, pragmatic, quasi-experimental trial design was used. HPV screening on self-collected cervical samples was offered to women aged 30-60 years. Implementation strategies were 1) Assessment of contextual factors using both qualitative and quantitative methods like key informant interviews (KII), focus group discussions (FGDs), pre-post population sample surveys, capacity assessment of participating departments 2) enhancing provider capacity through training workshops, access to HPV testing facility, colposcopy, thermal ablation/cryotherapy at the primary health care centers 3) community engagement, counselling for self-sampling and triage process by frontline health care workers (HCWs). Outcomes were assessed using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework. RESULTS: Screening rate in 8 months' of study was 31.0%, 26.7%, 32.9%, prevalence of oncogenic HPV was 12.1%, 3.1%, 5.5%, compliance to triage was 53.6%, 45.5%, 84.6% in tribal, urban slum, rural sites respectively. Pre-cancer among triage compliant HPV positive women was 13.6% in tribal, 4% in rural and 0% among urban slum women. Unique challenges faced in the tribal setting led to programme adaptations like increasing honoraria of community health workers for late-evening work and recalling HPV positive women for colposcopy by nurses, thermal ablation by gynaecologist at the outreach camp site. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collection of samples combined with HCW led community engagement activities, flexible triage processes and strengthening of health system showed an acceptable screening rate and better compliance to triage, highlighting the importance of identifying the barriers and developing strategies suitable for the setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/09/036130.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Colposcopy , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , India/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Resource-Limited Settings , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology
5.
Cancer Control ; 31: 10732748241244678, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563112

INTRODUCTION: Women living with HIV (WLHIV) have higher prevalence and persistence rates of high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) infection with a six-fold increased risk of cervical cancer. Thus, more frequent screening is recommended for WLHIV. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate and compare the prevalence of hr-HPV infection and abnormal findings on mobile colposcopy in two cohorts of WLHIV following cervical screening in rural and urban settings in Ghana. METHODS: Through the mPharma 10 000 Women Initiative, WLHIV were screened via concurrent hr-HPV DNA testing (MA-6000; Sansure Biotech Inc., Hunan, China) and visual inspection (Enhanced Visual Assessment [EVA] mobile colposcope; MobileODT, Tel Aviv, Israel) by trained nurses. The women were screened while undergoing routine outpatient reviews at HIV clinics held at the Catholic Hospital, Battor (rural setting) and Tema General Hospital (urban setting), both in Ghana. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty-eight WLHIV were included in the analysis (rural, n = 132; urban, n = 126). The two groups were comparable in terms of age, time since HIV diagnosis, and duration of treatment for HIV. The hr-HPV prevalence rates were 53.7% (95% CI, 45.3-62.3) and 48.4% (95% CI, 39.7-57.1) among WLHIV screened in the rural vs urban settings (p-value = .388). Abnormal colposcopy findings were found in 8.5% (95% CI, 5.1-11.9) of the WLHIV, with no significant difference in detection rates between the two settings (p-value = .221). Three (13.6%) of 22 women who showed abnormal colposcopic findings underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), leaving 19/22 women from both rural and urban areas with pending treatment/follow-up results, which demonstrates the difficulty faced in reaching early diagnosis and treatment, regardless of their area of residence. Histopathology following LEEP revealed CIN III in 2 WLHIV (urban setting, both hr-HPV negative) and CIN I in 1 woman in the rural setting (hr-HPV positive). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of hr-HPV among WLHIV in both rural and urban settings in this study in Ghana. Concurrent HPV DNA testing with a visual inspection method (colposcopy/VIA) reduces loss to follow-up compared to performing HPV DNA testing as a standalone test and recalling hr-HPV positive women for follow up with a visual inspection method. Concurrent HPV DNA testing and a visual inspection method may also pick up precancerous cervical lesions that are hr-HPV negative and may be missed if HPV DNA testing is performed alone.


HIV Infections , Papillomavirus Infections , Precancerous Conditions , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Colposcopy , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Ghana , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology
6.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Apr 13.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674275

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine spray in reducing the pain during colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy (CDB). Methods: From December 2017 to February 2019, 312 women undergoing CDBs were enrolled. The participants were randomized to three groups: group 1 (lidocaine spray), in which lidocaine spray was applied thoroughly to the cervix; group 2 (placebo), in which normal saline was applied thoroughly to the cervix; and group 3 (control), in which no anesthetic agent was applied to the cervix. Each woman completed a 10 cm visual analog scale to classify the subjective pain experience at three time points: baseline, immediately after biopsy, and 10 min after the procedure. The primary outcome of this study was the biopsy pain score. Results: The 312 enrolled women were randomly assigned to the three groups, amounting to 104 women per group. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the participants in all groups were comparable. The baseline, the biopsy, and the post-procedure pain scores were comparable among the three groups. There was a significant increase in the pain score from baseline to biopsy and from baseline to post-procedure in each group. The pain-score changes from baseline to biopsy in the lidocaine spray group significantly decreased when compared with the normal saline group (<0.001), and tended to decrease, though not significantly (p = 0.06), when compared with the control group. No complication with the intervention was observed. Conclusions: The application of lidocaine spray to the cervix has the benefit of reducing the pain associated with CDBs by a small amount. However, the intervention is safe and may be considered in nulliparous and/or overly anxious women undergoing the procedure.


Anesthetics, Local , Colposcopy , Lidocaine , Pain Measurement , Humans , Female , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Adult , Colposcopy/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement/methods , Biopsy/methods , Middle Aged , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/drug effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/standards , Pain/prevention & control , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Pain, Procedural/etiology
8.
Pan Afr Med J ; 47: 13, 2024.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38524109

In Morocco, the purpose of the National Cancer Prevention and Control Plan (PNPCC) is to decrease the incidence, mortality, and morbidity attributable to cervical cancer (CC), including the general objective which is to improve women´s care by setting up an organized system for screening, early diagnosis and treatment of this disease, and as operational objectives an: 1) achievement of at least 30% of the annual coverage rate by cervical cancer (CC) screening; 2) achievement of at least 80% of the rate of participation in CC screening per screening cycle; 3) achievement of 100% of the treatment rate for precancerous lesions screened within the framework of the program. CC screening concerns all women aged 30 to 49 years old. Women who have already had CC and pregnant women from the 8th week of amenorrhea until the 6th week postpartum are excluded from the program. The screening test currently used is the naked eye inspection with acetic acid or visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), which will be followed by a colposcopy exam and biopsy if a precancerous lesion is confirmed. The VIA is carried out at the level of urban and rural health centers, by a trained health professional. Knowing that the pap-smear test was widely used before. Thermo coagulation, also called: cold coagulation, is currently the main treatment for intraepithelial lesions (LIE) that are eligible for this treatment, and finally the national program has introduced anti-HPV vaccination within the national vaccination program (NPI).


Carcinoma in Situ , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Adult , Middle Aged , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Morocco , Mass Screening , Colposcopy , Papanicolaou Test , Acetic Acid , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control
9.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 349, 2024 Mar 19.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504211

BACKGROUND: Colposcopy plays an essential role in diagnosing cervical lesions and directing biopsy; however, there are few studies of the capabilities of colposcopists in medically underserved communities in China. This study aims to fill this gap by assessing colposcopists' competencies in medically underserved communities of China. METHODS: Colposcopists in medically underserved communities across China were considered eligible to participate. Assessments involved presenting participants with 20 cases, each consisting of several images and various indications. Participants were asked to determine transformation zone (TZ) type, colposcopic diagnoses and to decide whether biopsy was necessary. Participants are categorized according to the number of colposcopic examinations, i.e., above or below 50 per annum. RESULTS: There were 214 participants in this study. TZ determination accuracy was 0.47 (95% CI 0.45,0.49). Accuracy for colposcopic diagnosis was 0.53 (95% CI 0.51,0.55). Decision to perform biopsies was 0.73 accurate (95% CI 0.71,0.74). Participants had 0.61 (95% CI 0.59,0.64) sensitivity and a 0.80 (95% CI 0.79,0.82) specificity for detecting high-grade lesions. Colposcopists who performed more than 50 cases were more accurate than those performed fewer across all indicators, with a higher sensitivity (0.66 vs. 0.57, p = 0.001) for detecting high-grade lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In medically underserved communities of China, colposcopists appear to perform poorly at TZ identification, colposcopic diagnosis, and when deciding to biopsy. Colposcopists who undertake more than 50 colposcopies each year performed better than those who perform fewer. Therefore, colposcopic practice does improve through case exposure although there is an urgent need for further pre-professional and clinical training.


Colposcopy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Colposcopy/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Medically Underserved Area , Biopsy/methods , China
10.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 28(2): 124-130, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446575

OBJECTIVES: The Enduring Consensus Cervical Cancer Screening and Management Guidelines Committee developed recommendations for dual stain (DS) testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology for use of DS to triage high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive results. METHODS: Risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse were calculated according to DS results among individuals testing HPV-positive using data from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort and the STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES study in Mississippi. Management recommendations were based on clinical action thresholds developed for the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. Resource usage metrics were calculated to support decision-making. Risk estimates in relation to clinical action thresholds were reviewed and used as the basis for draft recommendations. After an open comment period, recommendations were finalized and ratified through a vote by the Consensus Stakeholder Group. RESULTS: For triage of positive HPV results from screening with primary HPV testing (with or without genotyping) or with cytology cotesting, colposcopy is recommended for individuals testing DS-positive. One-year follow-up with HPV-based testing is recommended for individuals testing DS-negative, except for HPV16- and HPV18-positive results, or high-grade cytology in cotesting, where immediate colposcopy referral is recommended. Risk estimates were similar between the Kaiser Permanente Northern California and STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES populations. In general, resource usage metrics suggest that compared with cytology, DS requires fewer colposcopies and detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Dual stain testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology is acceptable for triage of HPV-positive test results. Risk estimates are portable across different populations.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Colposcopy , Papillomaviridae
11.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 381, 2024 Mar 26.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528547

BACKGROUND: Inaccurate colposcopy diagnosis may lead to inappropriate management and increase the incidence of cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in women with transformation zone type 3 (TZ3). METHODS: Records from 764 patients with TZ3 who underwent colposcopy-directed biopsy and/or endocervical curettage in Putuo Hospital China between February 2020 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. Colposcopy was carried out based on 2011 International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) and Colposcopy nomenclature. The diagnostic performance of colposcopy for identifying CIN2 + was evaluated compared with biopsies. The Kappa and McNemar tests were used to perform statistical analyses. RESULTS: Among the study population, 11.0% had pathologic CIN2+. The relative sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of colposcopy for histologic CIN2 + were 51.2%, 96.5%, 64.2% and 94.1%, respectively. The senior colposcopists (80.6%) had a higher colposcopic accuracy to diagnose histologic CIN2 + than junior colposcopists (68.6%). In subgroup analyses, age group ≥ 60 years (70.3%) showed lowest diagnostic accuracy when compared with age groups of < 45 years (84.4%) and 45-59 years (74.9%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest an increased risk of diagnostic inaccuracy of colposcopy in identifying CIN2 + in those ≥ 60 years of age with TZ3, and the accuracy of colposcopy is required to be further improved.


Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Middle Aged , Colposcopy , Retrospective Studies , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy
12.
Int J Cancer ; 154(12): 2132-2141, 2024 Jun 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436201

Loss to follow-up (LTFU) within cervical screening programmes can result in missed clinically relevant lesions, potentially reducing programme effectiveness. To examine the health impact of losing women during the screening process, we determined the proportion of women LTFU per step of the Dutch hrHPV-based screening programme. We then determined the probability of being LTFU by age, screening history and sampling method (self- or clinician-sampled) using logistic regression analysis. Finally, we estimated the number of missed CIN2+/3+ lesions per LTFU moment by using the CIN-risk in women compliant with follow-up. Data from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga) was used. Women eligible for screening in 2017 and 2018 were included (N = 840,428). For clinician collected (CC) samples, the highest proportion LTFU was found following 'referral advice for colposcopy' (5.5% after indirect referral; 3.8% after direct referral). For self-sampling, the highest proportions LTFU were found following the advice for repeat cytology (13.6%) and after referral advice for colposcopy (8.2% after indirect referral; 4.3% after direct referral). Self-sampling users and women with no screening history had a higher LTFU-risk (OR: 3.87, CI: 3.55-4.23; OR: 1.39, CI: 1.20-1.61) compared to women that used CC sampling and women that have been screened before, respectively. Of all women LTFU in 2017/18, the total number of potentially missed CIN2+ was 844 (21% of women LTFU). Most lesions were missed after 'direct referral for colposcopy' (N = 462, 11.5% of women LTFU). So, this indicates a gap between the screening programme and clinical care which requires further attention, by improving monitoring of patients after referral.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Colposcopy , Mass Screening , Vaginal Smears/methods , Papillomaviridae
13.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 189, 2024 Mar 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515088

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether knowledge of cytology affects the colposcopist's diagnostic accuracy in the identification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and worse (≥ CIN2). METHOD: In this cross-over study, healthcare professionals interpreted colposcopy images from 80 patient cases with known histological diagnoses. For each case, 2 images taken with a colposcope were provided (native and after acetic acid application). Inclusion criteria consisted of women with a transformation zone type 1 or 2, who had both a cytological and histological diagnosis. Cases were distributed across two online surveys, one including and one omitting the cytology. A wash-out period of six weeks between surveys was implemented. Colposcopists were asked to give their diagnosis for each case as < CIN2 or ≥ CIN2 on both assessments. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the two interpretations. RESULTS: Knowledge of cytology significantly improved the sensitivity when interpreting colposcopic images, from 51.1% [95%CI: 39.3 to 62.8] to 63.7% [95%CI: 52.1 to 73.9] and improved the specificity from 63.5% [95%CI: 52.3 to 73.5] to 76.6% [95%CI: 67.2 to 84.0]. Sensitivity was higher by 38.6% when a high-grade cytology (ASC-H, HSIL, AGC) was communicated compared to a low-grade cytology (inflammation, ASC-US, LSIL). Specificity was higher by 31% when a low-grade cytology was communicated compared to a high-grade. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that knowledge of cytology increases sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of ≥ CIN2 lesions at colposcopy. Association between cytology and histology may have contributed to the findings.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Colposcopy/methods , Cross-Over Studies , Cytodiagnosis , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears/methods
14.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 28(2): 131-136, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465957

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the performance of different follow-up strategies after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3, including human papillomavirus (HPV) detection, cytology, or colposcopy, as well as their combinations. Additionally, we compared the influence of the persistence of HPV 16/18 versus that of other high-risk HPV genotypes (HR-HPV) in the recurrence risk. METHODS: Retrospective register-based study, including women who had an excision of the transformation zone for CIN2 or CIN3 at our institution, between January 2011 and December 2022. The outcome assessed was histopathological recurrence/persistence of CIN2 or worse. RESULTS: Of the 721 women included, 6.8% (49/721) had recurrence/persistence. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the HPV test were 97.4%, 80%, 22.3%, and 99.8%, respectively, whereas for cotesting (HR-HPV and cytology), 86.8%, 90.1%, 34.4%, and 99.1%, respectively. The referral rates for colposcopy were 24.3% and 14.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of colposcopy was low (40.0%).Women who were initially positive for non-16/18 genotypes at baseline who became HPV16/18 positive during follow-up, had a statistically significant increased risk of CIN2 or worse, compared with those who tested positive only for other HR-HPV genotypes during both stages (hazard ratio = 4.98; 95% CI = 1.66-14.91). CONCLUSIONS: Human papillomavirus testing is the best strategy for follow-up after treatment of cervical HSIL. The addition of cytology triage decreases by more than 40% the referrals for colposcopy, without significantly missing cases of recurrence/persistence. Human papillomavirus 16/18 in the follow-up, regardless of being previously positive, is associated with higher risk of recurrence/persistence of HSIL.


Papillomavirus Infections , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective Studies , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Colposcopy/adverse effects , Genotype , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/complications , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer/adverse effects
15.
J Med Virol ; 96(3): e29475, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415472

To investigate age and type-specific prevalences of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in hrHPV+ women referred to colposcopy. This is a retrospective, multicenter study. Participants were women referred to one of seven colposcopy clinics in China after testing positive for hrHPV. Patient characteristics, hrHPV genotyping, colposcopic impressions, and histological diagnoses were abstracted from electronic records. Main outcomes were age-related type-specific prevalences associated with hrHPV and CIN, and colposcopic accuracy. Among 4419 hrHPV+ women referred to colposcopy, HPV 16, 52, and 58 were the most common genotypes. HPV 16 prevalence was 39.96%, decreasing from 42.57% in the youngest group to 30.81% in the eldest group. CIN3+ prevalence was 15.00% and increased with age. As lesion severity increases, HPV16 prevalence increased while the prevalence of HPV 52 and 58 decreased. No age-based trend was identified with HPV16 prevalence among CIN2+, and HPV16-related CIN2+ was less common in women aged 60 and above (44.26%) compared to those younger than 60 years (59.61%). Colposcopy was 0.73 sensitive at detecting CIN2+ (95% confidence interval[CI]: 0.71, 0.75), with higher sensitivity (0.77) observed in HPV16+ women (95% CI: 0.74, 0.80) compared to HPV16- women (0.68, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.71). Distributions of hrHPV genotypes, CIN, and type-specific CIN in Chinese mainland hrHPV+ women referred to colposcopy were investigated for the first time. Distributions were found to be age-dependent and colposcopic performance appears related to HPV genotypes. These findings could be used to improve the management of women referred to colposcopy.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Male , Colposcopy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Genotype , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer
16.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 25(2): 419-424, 2024 Feb 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415526

OBJECTIVE: To introduce HPV self-sampling and out-reach colposcopy clinic as interventions to improve the follow-up of HPV positive women in a community based cervical cancer screening programme. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted during October 2017 to August 2019 and 2977 women underwent cervical cancer screening using CareHPV test. Follow up colposcopy for HPV positive women were conducted at the rural health center and alternatively as out-reach clinics in their own villages and default rates were compared. HPV positive women were followed up at one-year. They were given an option of either having a follow-up HPV test performed by a health care worker (HCW) or by self-sampling. Compliance to follow up in these two modalities were compared. A validated questionnaire was given to women who had given an HPV self-sample to assess their awareness about HPV and cervical cancer. RESULTS: During our initial round of cervical cancer screening using HPV as a primary screening modality, our HPV screen positive rate was 7.05% (210 out of 2977 women screened).  Our colposcopy rates following an initial invitation at the rural health centre was only 28.5%. Following this, we initiated out-reach colposcopy clinics at their own villages for HPV positive women and this increased colposcopy rates from 28.5% to 45.2%. The participation rate at one-year follow-up was increased from 40.5% to 60% by the introduction of self-sampling as a follow up option and 16.2% of women who were initially positive remained HPV positive at 12-14 months follow up. All women who were offered the option of self-sampling preferred it over a HCW collected sample. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that self-sampling could also be used effectively in the follow up of HPV positive women in the community. Outreach colposcopy clinics in their own villages enabled better follow up of HPV positive women.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Colposcopy , Follow-Up Studies , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomaviridae , Mass Screening , Vaginal Smears
17.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 25(1): 211-217, 2024 Jan 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285786

OBJECTIVE: Self- collected specimens to detect high-risk (hr) HPV and high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+) has been introduced aiming to increase cervical cancer screening coverage. The performance of self- collected specimen  compared to clinician collected specimen is one major concern. This study aimed to compare self-sampling HPV-DNA and clinician-sampling HPV-mRNA to detect hr-HPV and high-grade cervical lesions. METHODS: Women with abnormal cervical cytology and/ or positive hr-HPV who attended the colposcopy clinics in 10 tertiary hospitals in Bangkok were enrolled. Self-collected specimens were evaluated for  HPV DNA using Cobas® 4800 HPV test prior to the clinician-collected specimens which were tested for HPV mRNA with APTIMA® HPV Assay. Subsequent colposcopy with biopsy was performed. The detection rates of hr-HPV from both HPV tests and their performance to detect high-grade lesions pathology were compared. RESULTS: Data from 497 women's specimens were analyzed. Both samplings had 86.8% concordance rate in detecting hr-HPV (Kappa 0.670; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.599-0.746, P value < 0.001). The sensitivity (95% CI) of self-collected specimen HPV DNA and clinician- collected specimen HPV-mRNA to detect high-grade lesions were 91.8% (85.4%-96.0%) and 90.2% (83.6%-94.9%) respectively. The corresponding negative predictive values (95% CI) were 91.9% (85.6%-96.0%) and 91.7% (86.0%-95.7%) respectively. CONCLUSION: HPV DNA testing from self-collected specimen to detect HR-HPV demonstrates high concordance with HPV mRNA testing from clinician-collected specimen. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of both tests to detect high-grade lesions are comparable.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Thailand , Specimen Handling , Colposcopy , DNA , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 165(2): 507-518, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37950533

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for effective triage following positive primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in low- and middle-income countries with high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-prevalence have not previously been established. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of three triage methods for positive HPV results in women living with HIV (WLHIV) and without HIV in Botswana. METHODS: We conducted baseline enrollment of a prospective cohort study from February 2021 to August 2022 in South-East District, Botswana. Non-pregnant women aged 25 or older with an intact cervix and no prior diagnosis of cervical cancer were systematically consented for enrollment, with enrichment of the cohort for WLHIV. Those who consented completed a questionnaire and then collected vaginal self-samples for HPV testing. Primary HPV testing for 15 individual genotypes was conducted using Atila AmpFire® HPV assay. Those with positive HPV results returned for a triage visit where all underwent visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), colposcopy, and biopsy. Triage strategies with VIA, colposcopy and 8-type HPV genotype restriction (16/18/31/33/35/45/52/58), separately and in combination, were compared using histopathology as the gold standard in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+). RESULTS: Among 2969 women enrolled, 1480 (50%) tested HPV positive. The cohort included 1478 (50%) WLHIV; 99% were virologically suppressed after a mean of 8 years on antiretroviral therapy. In total, 1269 (86%) women had histopathology data for analysis. Among WLHIV who tested positive for HPV, 131 (19%) of 688 had CIN2+ compared with 71 (12%) of 581 in women without HIV. Screening by 8-type HPV genotype restriction was more sensitive as triage to detect CIN2+ in WLHIV 87.79% (95% CI: 80.92-92.85) and women without HIV 85.92% (95% CI: 75.62-93.03) when compared with VIA (WLHIV 62.31% [95% CI: 53.39-70.65], women without HIV 44.29% [95% CI: 32.41-56.66]) and colposcopy (WLHIV 70.77% [95% CI: 62.15-78.41], women without HIV 45.71% [95% CI: 33.74-58.06]). However, 8-type HPV genotype restriction had low specificity in WLHIV of 30.88% (95% CI: 27.06-34.90) and women without HIV 37.06% (95% CI: 32.85-41.41). These results were similar when CIN3+ was used as the outcome. When combining 8-type HPV genotype restriction with VIA as the triage strategy, there was improved specificity to detect CIN2+ in WLHIV of 81.65% (95% CI: 78.18-84.79) but dramatically reduced sensitivity of 56.15% (95% CI: 47.18-64.84). CONCLUSIONS: Eight-type HPV genotype restriction is a promising component of effective triage for HPV positivity. However, novel triage strategies in LMICs with high HIV prevalence may be needed to avoid the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity with currently available options. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT04242823, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04242823.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Male , Prospective Studies , HIV , Triage/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Botswana/epidemiology , Prevalence , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Colposcopy , Genotype , Acetic Acid , Early Detection of Cancer/methods
19.
Int J Cancer ; 154(6): 1073-1081, 2024 Mar 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38088449

As Norway considers revising triage approaches following their first adolescent cohort with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination entering the cervical cancer screening program, we analyzed the health impact and cost-effectiveness of alternative primary HPV triage approaches for women initiating cervical cancer screening in 2023. We used a multimodeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to evaluate the health benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of alternative extended genotyping and age-based triage strategies under five-yearly primary HPV testing (including the status-quo screening strategy in Norway) for women born in 1998 (ie, age 25 in 2023). We examined 35 strategies that varied alternative groupings of high-risk HPV genotypes ("high-risk" genotypes; "medium-risk" genotypes or "intermediate-risk" genotypes), number and types of HPV included in each group, management of HPV-positive women to direct colposcopy or active surveillance, wait time for re-testing and age at which the HPV triage algorithm switched from less to more intensive strategies. Given the range of benchmarks for severity-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway, we found that the preferred strategy for vaccinated women aged 25 years in 2023 involved an age-based switch from a less to more intensive follow-up algorithm at age 30 or 35 years with HPV-16/18 genotypes in the "high-risk" group. The two potentially cost-effective strategies could reduce the number of colposcopies compared to current guidelines and simultaneously improve health benefits. Using age to guide primary HPV triage, paired with selective HPV genotype and follow-up time for re-testing, could improve both the cervical cancer program effectiveness and efficiency.


Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adolescent , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Triage , Early Detection of Cancer , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Colposcopy , Norway
20.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 165(1): 169-175, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38071725

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the utility of fluorescein sodium (FNa) as a contrast agent for colposcopy to detect premalignant and malignant lesions of cervix. The primary objective was to determine and compare the percentage detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of FNa and acetic acid (AA) positive areas. METHODS: This study included 120 screen positive women who underwent colposcopy using both 3% AA and FNa (0.06%). Observations for FNa staining were made under blue filter and directed biopsies were taken from acetowhite and fluorescent green areas. Benign lesions were considered as disease-negative and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), high grade SIL (HSIL), and invasive cancer were considered as disease-positive. Correlation between histopathology and FNa and AA was determined by Kappa statistics. RESULTS: The mean age was 39.59 ± 10.73 years and median parity was 2. Out of 120 patients, 57 had benign lesions, 18 had LSIL, 33 had HSIL and 12 had invasive carcinomas. Sensitivity was 98.41% versus 64.91% respectively and specificity was 85.71% versus 35.09% respectively with FNa and AA. Diagnostic accuracy of FNa and AA was 82.50% versus 61.60%. There was good agreement between FNa staining and final histopathology and fair agreement between AA application and HPE (κ = 0.643 vs 0.213, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using FNa as a contrast agent during colposcopy results in greater accuracy for detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix as compared to AA.


Precancerous Conditions , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Fluorescein , Cross-Sectional Studies , Contrast Media , Colposcopy/methods , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Acetic Acid , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/pathology
...